Current:Home > InvestAdobe steered consumers to pricey services and made it hard to cancel, feds say -SecureNest Finance
Adobe steered consumers to pricey services and made it hard to cancel, feds say
View
Date:2025-04-17 20:22:48
The U.S. government is suing Adobe, accusing the software maker of steering customers toward a pricey subscription plan while concealing how much it costs to cancel the service.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) said Monday that Adobe deceives customers by "hiding" the early termination fee for the company's services, which includes popular tools such as Acrobat, Photoshop and Illustrator.
Specifically, Adobe encouraged consumers to enroll in its "annual, paid month" plan without disclosing that canceling could cost hundreds of dollars, according to the agency. Users who do try to cancel are met unfair roadblocks, the lawsuit filed in federal court in California also alleges.
"In numerous instances, subscribers who have requested to cancel through Adobe's customer service believe they have successfully cancelled but continue to be charged," the lawsuit states. "Some of these subscribers do not realize for months that Adobe is continuing to charge them, and only learn about the charges when they review their financial accounts."
Adobe defends its practices
Adobe will dispute the allegations in court, a company official said Monday.
"Subscription services are convenient, flexible and cost effective to allow users to choose the plan that best fits their needs, timeline and budget," Dana Rao, Adobe's general counsel, said in a statement. "Our priority is to always ensure our customers have a positive experience. We are transparent with the terms and conditions of our subscription agreements and have a simple cancellation process."
At issue is a software product Adobe calls the Creative Cloud, a package of programs that artists and other online professionals have used for years to edit photos and videos, build websites and do graphic design. Customers have complained about the Adobe cancellation process on social media and with the Better Business Bureau, according to the government's lawsuit.
Prior to 2012, Adobe sold its software under a user license in which a customer paid one price and was given rights to use that software indefinitely, the suit alleges. Customers are now offered one of three different types of subscriptions — monthly, annual paid monthly or annual prepaid.
On its website, Adobe lists the monthly plan at $89.99 a month, the yearly paid monthly at $59.99 a month and the yearly paid upfront at $54.99 a month. The prices differ for a group subscription and for students and educators.
Thriving subscription business
Adobe's revenue from the subscription services have ballooned from $7.7 billion in 2019 to $14.2 billion last year, according to the complaint.
The lawsuit names Adobe vice president Maninder Sawhney and the president of Adobe's digital media business, David Wadhwani, as defendants. The FTC alleges that Adobe's practices violate the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act by failing to disclose the cancellation fee prominently enough at signup, not getting informed consent from a customer about those fees and by not offering customers a simple cancellation process.
"Adobe trapped customers into year-long subscriptions through hidden early termination fees and numerous cancellation hurdles," Samuel Levine, the FTC's consumer protection bureau director, said in a statement. "Americans are tired of companies hiding the ball during subscription signup and then putting up roadblocks when they try to cancel."
The FTC in 2023 proposed a "click to cancel" rule that would require businesses to make it as easy to cancel subscriptions as it is to enroll.
- In:
- Lawsuit
- Federal Trade Commission
Khristopher J. Brooks is a reporter for CBS MoneyWatch. He previously worked as a reporter for the Omaha World-Herald, Newsday and the Florida Times-Union. His reporting primarily focuses on the U.S. housing market, the business of sports and bankruptcy.
TwitterveryGood! (344)
Related
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- Police in Australia identify the Sydney stabbing attacker who killed 6 people
- Jessica Alba says she's departing role as chief creative officer at Honest to pursue new endeavors
- Wildlife ecologist Rae Wynn-Grant talks breaking barriers and fostering diversity in new memoir
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- Who made cut at Masters? Did Tiger Woods make Masters cut? Where cut line landed and who made it
- How to get rid of NYC rats without brutality? Birth control is one idea
- Judge rejects defense efforts to dismiss Hunter Biden’s federal gun case
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Woman who stabbed classmate in 2014 won’t be released: See timeline of the Slender Man case
Ranking
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- Nearing 50 Supreme Court arguments in, lawyer Lisa Blatt keeps winning
- Big E gives update on WWE status two years after neck injury: 'I may never be cleared'
- Biden’s ballot access in Ohio and Alabama is in the hands of Republican election chiefs, lawmakers
- Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
- Wilmer Valderrama talks NCIS franchise's 1,000th episode, show's enduring legacy
- Small earthquake shakes Southern California desert during Coachella music festival
- Wilmer Valderrama talks NCIS franchise's 1,000th episode, show's enduring legacy
Recommendation
Jorge Ramos reveals his final day with 'Noticiero Univision': 'It's been quite a ride'
Ex-Kentucky swim coach Lars Jorgensen accused of rape, sexual assault in lawsuit
2024 Masters tee times for Round 3 Saturday: When does Tiger Woods tee off?
Greg Norman is haunting Augusta National. What patrons thought of him at the Masters
The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
Masters 2024 highlights: Round 2 leaderboard, how Tiger Woods did and more
Noncitizen voting isn’t an issue in federal elections, regardless of conspiracy theories. Here’s why
DNC paid $1.7 million to Biden's lawyers in special counsel probe